Responsible You

I cringe every time AKC sends out a notice about "responsible dog owners" and encourages us to have a day to celebrate them.

Why do we celebrate "Mother's Day" and not "Loving Mother's Day"?

Because there is a presumption of mother=love and nurture. Not always the case, I realize, but surely it is true most of the time.

Why do we have "President's Day" and not "Ethical President's Day"?

Again, there is a a presumption of ethics and honor among those who hold the highest office in our land. Not all of them, most likely, but the overwhelming majority have been ethical, honorable men.

Why do we have "Parents' Night" at school, instead of "Dependable Parents' Night"? After all, those who don't show up must surely be unreliable and uncaring! Why not infer that in the title of the event?

It's all in the nuance of the language we use, folks. Just including a feel-good adjective like "responsible" in the phrase "responsible dog owners" infers that there is a reciprocal and significantly large segment of irresponsible dog owners out there. And of course, we need more rules and regulations to deal with them! Just ask the animal rights groups, the humane societies and the "rescuers".

That's the short lesson for today. It seems so obvious and simple, yet very few people seem to have a grasp on life's self-evident truths.

So sorry, it was an "anesthesia reaction"

Either we dog breeders are turning out a bunch of severely defective dogs or our veterinarians are lying to us.

Can't count the number of times over the past few years that I have heard these stories:

Dog died getting teeth cleaned - anesthesia reaction

Dog died during spay/neuter surgery - anesthesia reaction

We are talking YOUNG dogs here, not old dogs with failing organs. Young dogs who were perfectly healthy prior to undergoing their procedures.

And if your vet says, it was an "anesthesia reaction" what are you to say? You weren't there, so you don't know what happened. You don't know if the dog was overdosed, or the tube came out before he was awake, or if it was really an "anesthesia reaction"; if your dog had some profound reaction to the anesthesia itself that killed him.

Would we accept our doctor's statement that our spouse/child/parent died during surgery due to an "anesthesia reaction"? You can bet the answer would be NO. There would be an investigation, and the parties involved would have to testify as to exactly what happened. Medical malpractice is the scenario, and thankfully is relatively uncommon. The threat of litigation keeps your doctor on his best behavior. He utilizes clinincal monitors and exercises his best judgement at all times. Anything less would be professional suicide.

But understandably, there is not the same standard of care for animals including our dogs. When the vet blames an "anesthesia reaction" you can suspect that possibly he didn't want to have to say, "I'm sorry, I didn't monitor him closely enough" or "Gosh darn it, I nicked an artery."

I hope to hear from some veterinarians on this, because I would love to be wrong on this. Are there many dogs who are so susceptible to anesthesia that it kills them outright, even while you have them intubated and on life support?

From Ron Hines, DVM: "We veterinarians are fortunate in that older, less predictable, anethesthetics have been replaced by compounds that are very predictable and safe when properly used."

http://www.2ndchance.info/anesthesia.htm

ASPCA - they're at it again

Hey, I was just sitting here, minding my own business, happily playing on Facebook, with Fox Business News on in the background, when WHAM! Suddenly I was subjected to a very disturbing interview. Some woman from the ASPCA was lecturing Lou Dobbs about pet store puppies.

You know, they are all from "puppy mills", they are selling sick dogs; rescued dogs are the way to go; 7 million dogs enter shelters each year and half are killed; and in surveys, 9 out of 10 dog owners prefers their "rescued" pet to a pet store pet. (A little bit of journalistic sarcasm there with the 9 out of 10 thing, but she did essentially state this, claiming this to be the result of some satisfaction survey)

Mind you, this is the ASPCA talking here. They just recently paid out a whopping $9.3 million settlement to Feld Entertainment (Ringling Bros Circus) when charged under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. Seems they were involved in manufacturing evidence of animal abuse. Is it any surprise that their representative would LIE on national television?

So naturally, I had to pipe up and write to Lou Dobbs. Do you know that the ASPCA is not trustworty? Using pejorative slurs when referring to breeders is offensive and just plain wrong. Do you know that "rescues" are importing hundred of thousands of dogs annually? Do you know that consumer protection "puppy lemon laws" do not apply to shelter and rescue pets? And, let me fill you in on something; there were 2.3 million animals killed in shelters..that's dogs and cats combined, roughly about a 50-50 mix. NOT half of 7 million, or 3.5 million DOGS ALONE, which she impled was the case. Perhaps a million adoptable dogs killed because shelters don't make the earnest effort to find them homes...of which there are over 20 million opening up for pets each and every year.

There is also evidence that the pet industry provides more veterinarian care for puppies than the public at large. DVM/VPI Insurance Group, the largest provider of animal health insurance, testified during a hearing in California that "preconceived notions" concerning pet store puppies "could not have been more wrong."

After insuring more than 89,000 pet store puppies and kittens and handling health claims from a pool of more than 500,000 insured animals, the insurance company reduced its premiums for pet store puppies and kittens substantially by as much as 22 percent compared to premiums charged for animals from other sources. Why? Pet store puppies receive more veterinary attention during the first 12 weeks of age than any other puppies and, as a result, have fewer claims.

In other words....pet store puppies are healthier than puppies from other sources.

I'll let you know if I get any feedback (not likely). Methinks Lou Dobbs has been hoodwinked. He took the lazy way out and let his "expert" do his research for him. Big mistake, but par for the course on television news lately.

Whatever happened to REAL investigative journalism, anyway?

Do Dogs Have an Edge Over Humans When it Comes To Intelligence

I would have to say yes – dogs have an intelligencethat exceeds and defies many modern day humans…and within this concept resides the real key to understanding and training your dog...

Base and Refined Intelligence - Humans & Dogs

The First Intelligence, as I see it operates in the absence of refined thought. This form of intelligence has its foundation in base instinct and inherited traits. 

Your inherited traits determine your pre-disposition to be:

• An introvert or an extrovert
• Left Brain, or Right Brain. 

So how can that effect your intelligence? Well for example...

• Left Brain Hemisphere;
• If you fall into this category you may have a pre-disposition to be:
• Naturally confident...
• Calm,
• Dominant;  
• Tolerant.

• Right Brain Hemisphere
• If you fall into this category you may have a pre-disposition to be:
• Naturally insecure...
• Lacking in confidence;
• Nervous;
• Anxious;
• Fearful.

Base instinct can be seen in the behaviour of individual human beings and in the collective behaviour of multiple human beings. For example:

• When humans get together to form a crowd, which then due to various triggers results in a heightened degree of reactivity.  

The trigger to this behaviour may be an event at which sudden violence, unfulfilled expectation or fulfilled expectation – i.e.  team win at a sporting event, political success or failure at an election count, occurs.

• One or more people in the crowd instantaneously react, and;
• Other individuals in the crowd respond;
• Either matching the state of the first people to react, or;
• Reacting in a polar opposite manner but with the same intensity;
• Within a matter of seconds (depending on the situation):
• Fear and panic spread, or;
• Violence, and/or;
• Avarice and greed may result in looting, theft, etc.
• This is commonly known as:
• Crowd Behaviour/Mentality or;
• Mob Behaviour/Mentality;
• In the extended animal kingdom (beings other than ‘mankind’) this same type of behaviour  is referred to as Pack Mentality'

I always find it interesting that humans must have one term for human behaviour and another for non-human behaviour – though the ‘behaviour’ exhibited is the same regardless of the type of animal (human or non-human).

This first type of human intelligence is firmly grounded in basic, raw survival instinct and when not combined with refined instinct (see further below) becomes a mentality that is exclusively:

• Me first;
• Solely for my good – not for the greater good;
• It must be noted that the first type of intelligence
• This is not leadershipit is instead reflective of the widely misunderstood term ‘Alpha’
• While all of the above may promote short term survival, it does not promote long-term survival of an individual, a species or a planet.
• Also interesting to note... 
• What is it that humans like so much about dogs?...
• A dog's selflessness;
• And what is it that many human beings have a very difficult time being?
•  Selfless. 

I never use the terms ‘dumb as a cow’, ‘you follow like a sheep’ etc. Simply because the behaviours in animals, that are so despised by humans are practiced by humans on a daily basis. So the behaviour is, as I see it - just as human in nature as it may be ‘sheep like’ or ‘cow like’. I, like a dog do not enjoy hypocrisy so  I consciously and spiritually choose (and endevour) not to be dismissive of non-human animals 

Humans are animals and behave like animals – and that is in accordance with nature and natural base instinct. This is a very important concept that when tossed aside, due to human hubris:

• Limits the individual human's perspective;
• Which in-turn reduces that individual's potential for broader intelligence;
• Which leaves the door-open for that individual's intelligence to become narrowly focused to the point of obsession or extremism;
• Which when shared and adopted by other human beings, limits collective human intelligence; 
• Which  leaves the door-open for crowd mentality - the collective intelligence of the group of people may become narrowly focused to the point of obsession or extremism;

To bring this particular concept back to the human-dog relationship, one only needs to cite Pit Bulls, Bully breeds and Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) in North America or as it is known in the UK - Dangerous Dogs Act (DDA);

• BSL/DDA is not based on actual fact, but instead on a narrow, uninformed perspective;
• Human hurbris which then creates genocide...mass murder carried out by man'kind' whether done to humans or dogs it is genocide

I am a firm believer that dogs have all of the emotions that humans have – with one exception, cruelty. Cruelty is not a canine trait – it is a human trait which humans also share with some species of primates.

The Second Intelligence is refined intelligence – which consists of base and refined instinct -  instinct that has been layered and cultured with:

• Intuition;
• Common sense;
• Combined with;
• Logic;
• Self-awareness;
• Self restraint;
• Empathy;
• Consideration;
• Patience;
• Humility.

When a human seeks to:

• Understand and look at something from multiple perspectives (as opposed to a linear and/or judgmental perspective);
• Filtered through commonsense and self-discipline;
• The human is deploying mature, considered intelligence;
• Rather than allowing ire, raw unconsidered emotion and greed to take over.

When a human approaches their relationship with another being using this type of intelligence: The human is enabled to see, learn and employ respect;

• By observing and assessing what truly presents to their senses;
• Rather than what they assume – based on preconceived notions.
• A perfect example of this is the typical notion that a dog is just a dog and cannot possibly be smiling.  
• A conceit which is factually incorrect.
• Despite the fact that mankind has lived with dogs for 30 thousand years;
• The mass of humanity via our assumption that our (humankind’s) abilities outstrip that of other animals  - has for most people, blinded them to the fact that dogs do smile.

As John Lubbock said “What we see depends mainly on what we look for”

If a greater percentage of humanity had more of the second type of intelligence and less of the first, humans would not be so self-destructive and generally destructive...we would not be so destructive and disrespectful to other animals and the environment. After all, it is the human animal – not non-human animals, that has and continues to negatively impact the health of the Earth.

It is only by adhering to unrestrained, unconsidered narrow perspective that a human can carry the expectation that in order to ‘train’ a dog:

• You dog, me human and for that reason alone dog, you shall do as I say;
• Your intelligence (dog) is such that I must either use:
• Treats, and/or;
• Silly tactics (i.e. dropping chain bags, marching you in different directions while on a lead, spraying you in the face, putting a pheromone collar on you, placing little piles of food on the floor so you understand that it is me the human feeding you, etc.), and/or;
• Force-dominance ‘training’.

When, in fact all the human needed to do was adopt the same sense of self-awareness, self discipline and communication skills employed by a well adjusted dog.

As Bernard Shaw so wisely said:

"The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place"

Additional Influences on Intelligence

The Ability To Communicate Effectively

If you are not perceptive and are not a particularly good communicator your ability to understand others can be seriously and adversely effected. 

• Do you know if you are a well-rounded perceptive and effective communicator? 
• Does your ability to communicate match your dog's ability to perceive and communicate?

Take a look at the following list, it describes (in point form) many of the ways that dogs perceive and communicate.

• Sight i.e...
• Observation of Body Language i.e...
• Facial expressions (dog and human faces);
• Micro body language - i.e. tension in the way you hold your hand;
• Macro body language - i.e. how you stand and occupy space;
•  How you move - i.e. quickly in agitation or frustration, forcefully in anger, grounded, solid and calm, etc.
• Sound i.e...
• Pitch/timber of voice;
• Emotion behind voice;
• Scent i.e.
• If a human is nervous your scent can be slightly different than when you are calm - a dog's sense of smell is so acute slight changes in scent are perceptible;
• Breathing i.e.  
• Short, deep, regular, withheld, etc.
• Extra Sensory Perception 

If you only understand or are aware of communication in terms of voice you are a less  intelligent communicator than your dog is.

And Then There is Hypersensitivity, Another Layer of Intelligence...
 
People (highly sensitive people - HSP) 
Dogs (highly sensitive dogs - HSD)

Hypersensitivity in both people and dogs:

• Is not a disorder;
• Is not a disadvantage when recognized, and;
• In fact it can be a valuable gift and advantage - which simply presents another layer of intelligence...for example:
•  An HSP or HSD can quickly read the mood of another person (human/canine); can pick up the scent of illness, sense the onset of a seizure before it occurs, be extra attentive, etc.

Some signs that your dog (or you!) are hypersensitive are:

•  Heightened levels of awareness/sensitivity to:
• Physical stimuli, i.e. sound, sight, touch, smell ;
• Emotional Stimuli, i.e. emotions of others;
• Easily over-whelmed - 'flooded' by to much stimuli.

• A person or dog that is hyper sensitive is more likely than a non HSP or HSD to suffer from:
• Allergies, asthma, skin conditions such as eczema.   

The key is to recognize HSD. Dogs that are HSD may show acute signs of hyper-active behaviour  if good leadership is lacking in the dog's life. The cure is not to medicate the dog with Doggie Prozac, but instead to ensure that the dog's natural requirement for:

leadership, psychological and physical exercise is achieved. It should be noted that,

• An HSD does not require more exercise than a non-HSD dog;  
• In-fact over stimulation with non-structured exercise will create more hyperactivity! 

The remedy is to provide:

• An equal balance between appropriate quantity of physical and psychological exercise;
• A truly good diet, which includes sufficient levels of nutrients such as Omega-3 Fatty Acids, which when lacking in the diet can create serious impediments to optimal brain and body function.

An example of the benefits of HSP/HSD

 I am an HSP.

• I see my hypersensitivity as a great gift is it allows me to work with dogs and their humans in a manner that others cannot;
• I can sense things that a non-HSP would not be able to sense;
• I can alert to a person's thoughts and read them as a dog does;
• I can read/sense a dog more as another dog would;
• I can from personal experience understand how a dog get's flooded by stimuli;
• I can sense and work intuitively to shift my methods in the most subtle of ways to better suit the individual dog.

If you want to see an example of: 

• A hypersensitive dog;
• The extreme damage that can be done to the dog in the absence of intelligent leadership, and;
• The impact of giving that dog proper leadership; 
• You can read my Boxer Robbie's Bio.

 Understanding The Fine Details

Can lack of consideration in taking into account social and cultural norms affect your intelligence? Yes, because it can effect your judgement, your approach and your understanding of a situation.

Here is an example:

• White Anglo-Saxons males greet each other by shaking hands;
• French Quebecois may choose to greet each other with a light kiss on either side of the face;
• A white Anglo-Saxon - who has never seen the typical French Quebecois greeting; might react with great offense at having their personal space invaded to the point of being kissed on either cheek.

• Hand-shaking and/or kissing in greeting was not a traditional means of greeting for the  indigenous peoples of Northern Canada.
• Why? Well for very practical reasons. In deep-cold temperatures hands can freeze if exposed to the cold, as well shaking someone's hands when your hands are encumbered by bulky gloves is not practical;
• Kissing is not practical when exposed to deep cold as lips can freeze; 
• If instead the means of greeting was to rub noses, hands would remain warm and lips would remain safe from freezing. So rubbing noses to greet made greet sense for those living in the extremely cold climate of the north.   

• If you do not have an awareness of how a culture, different from the one you grew up in functions you can make make social blunders which may be inconvenient at best and physically or psychologically damaging at worst.

How is this relevant to the dog-human relationship?

A dog's natural method of greeting starts with the nose and not (as many humans insist on doing) invading immediate personal space with frenzied pats and high pitched voices. Invasion of personal space and lack of consideration in when and how we touch another being (human or canine)shows little attention to forethought, respect and for that matter intelligence. 

Humans set their children up from a very young age to have limited intelligence when it comes to respecting and understanding a dog. Take a look at this and see if any of this sounds familiar to you.

The question I would pose to you is how does a human reflect a high level of intelligence when that human adamantly insists on greeting a dog in a manner that is disrespectful to a dog?

Would you go up to someone from another culture and greet them in a manner that was destabilizing or threatening to them? No, not if you were employing your intelligence.

Is it a reflection of ignorance, entitlement and lack of common sense? It seems to me that that mankind has a long standing notion that all other species on this earth are:

• Less intelligent than a human, and;
• Are due less respect than a human.

Its just my opinion, but as far as I am concerned, mankind's long term attitude is not reflective of a truly intelligent species.

 
Dogs Have Many Similarities to Humans?

What happens if every time a child does something that is normal, polite, respectful - you give that child a treat? That child learns an altered state of normal...'for every normal thing I do in life I must be rewarded with a material thing (food, toy, etc.)'. Should the parent put this type of reward-based system in place, that child will become a mal-adjusted human being, who will likely also be overweight and have bad teeth. And what do you do if you are out with the child and forget to bring treats, you are not near s store , yet you need the child to 'behave themselves'. You will have a non-complaint, un-coperative little person on your hands. 

And what happens when that person enters school and later then workforce - it will be difficult for that person to cope with real normal.  

It is the same for a dog. A dog does not require treats as an incentive to perform a normal, social skill - adult dogs do not give puppy's treats..the adult dog simply provides the puppy with clear, respectful direction. The puppy complies. It is only when the human is an uninformed communicator that treats are required to get a puppy to comply to normal behaviour. 

So, who has greater intelligence:

• The mother dog who teaches her puppies social skills by using clear communication, or;
• The human who does not grasp how to communicate effectively and therefore must entice a puppy with treats?

The mother dog is the better and more intelligent communicator.

 

So having read the above, now consider, who is more intelligent – dog or human.

For me, personally - as I wrote on the ‘Tales Page’ of my website some years ago…

 “I recognize that I know a little about many things and everything about nothing. It is this realization that inspires me to learn at every opportunity, every day”

Dogs are amazing – you just have to forget many of the human conceits you have learned about dogs and instead do what I do, what I teach my clients to do and as Edward Hogland so perfectly expressed…

“In order to really enjoy a dog, one dosen’t merely try to train him to be semi-human. The point of it is to open oneself up to the possibility of becoming partly dog.”

To correct a dogs 'behaviour' you must:

• First correct the human's behaviour, and at the same time;
• Communicate effectively with the dog;
• Ensure that there is proper structure in the dog's daily life:
• Which includes closing the gaps in all of 'little behaviours' (that occur in the span of a typical day) which feed the larger 'unwanted behaviours' (what most people see as the' dog's issue').

A dog's behavioural issues start with a gap in psychological fulfillment, so for example the dog has been asking for direction and the human either has never seen ‘the ask’, does not understand ‘the ask’, or answers the ‘ask’ the wrong way. 

The lack of psychological fulfilment then results in a physical reaction to the situation where the ‘ask was not satisfied with a logical, well adjusted, properly aligned, directive response. The problem does not reside in the dog but, instead in the human's inability to understand how to properly communicate. 

In addition to all that was discussed above, some dogs just like some people are hypersensitive. Dogs that are hypersensitive are even more adversely affected by poor communication on the part of their humans. 

And with that I leave you to ponder the true intelligence of man v.s. dog. 

------------------------

• Training;
• Behaviour Modification;
• Rehabilitation;
• Nutrition;
• Health

Whether you are experiencing dog behavior problems and would like assistance, or just want to bring your dog up to be a well-balanced canine -  I offer both a local and international service for people with one or multiple dogs. 

I work with all breeds - from small (i.e. Yorkie, Pomeranian, Chihuahua, etc.), medium breeds size (including Pit Bulls) and large breed dogs...

In-person SessionsDog Training, Puppy Training, Behaviour Modification, Rehabilitation – Ottawa, Ottawa Area, Outaouais, Ottawa Valley

 

International e-Consultation 

Sessions,Advice via email for National and International Clients - Dog Training, Puppy Training, Behaviour Modification, Nutrition, Health